<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kimberly&#039;s Blog &#187; yum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kimmy.blogit.co.nz/tag/yum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kimmy.blogit.co.nz</link>
	<description>Because sometimes 140 Characters just isn&#039;t enough..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 03:27:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<cloud domain='kimmy.blogit.co.nz' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Bluequartz Yum-Gui Users left in the Lurch</title>
		<link>http://kimmy.blogit.co.nz/2009/03/09/bluequartz-yum-gui-users-left-in-the-lurch/</link>
		<comments>http://kimmy.blogit.co.nz/2009/03/09/bluequartz-yum-gui-users-left-in-the-lurch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 23:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bluequartz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[centos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gui]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[packages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kimmy.blogit.co.nz/2009/03/bluequartz-yum-gui-users-left-in-the-lurch/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, While I personally havn’t used the Yum-Gui on Bluequartz/CentOS, I do find it odd that even though someone would close their business they would then go and put an update on the BQ update server to remove a package that I’m sure a lot of people would use. I can understand Nuonce removing their <a href="http://kimmy.blogit.co.nz/2009/03/09/bluequartz-yum-gui-users-left-in-the-lurch/">[Read the Rest...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://kimmy.blogit.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/yumgui2.jpg" target="_blank"><img style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 5px" src="http://kimmy.blogit.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/yumgui-thumb2.jpg" border="0" alt="BQ Yum Gui" width="260" height="164" align="right" /></a> Ok, While I personally havn’t used the Yum-Gui on <a title="BlueQuartz - Open Source RaQ 550" href="http://bluequartz.org/" target="_blank">Bluequartz</a>/<a title="Centos Enterprise Linux" href="http://www.centos.org/" target="_blank">CentOS</a>, I do find it odd that even though someone would close their business they would then go and put an update on the BQ update server to remove a package that I’m sure a lot of people would use.</p>
<p>I can understand Nuonce removing their repository for yum, but why go and do something that seems to be just stupid.</p>
<p>I see Solarspeed.net still has the .pkg available for download for the yum-gui but I suspect if it were to be installed a yum update would promptly remove it again.</p>
<p>Ok well, I have just tested it on my server. and if you install the .pkg from SolarSpeed.net it seems to stay there. I guess time will tell for how long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kimmy.blogit.co.nz/2009/03/09/bluequartz-yum-gui-users-left-in-the-lurch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

